Biden Openly Targeting Rural Communities
Bear proposal will very likely have grisly outcome
In a flagrant act of aggression against the rural residents of northern Washington state, the Biden administration released a scheme to ‘reintroduce’ grizzly bears to the North Cascades National Park.
The plan, revealed Friday morning, has three potential options. Two of those move forward with the ‘restoration’ of the bears in the park, while the third would maintain the current status quo in how the bears are managed; that would mean no new bears in the area.
While the proposal is purportedly still in the tentative stages, with the public ‘invited’ to offer suggestions regarding it, it seems like a done deal to many opponents. Congressional Western Caucus Chairman Dan Newhouse [R-WA], is one of those...
"Time and again, our communities have spoken to express staunch opposition to the introduction of these apex predators, which would be detrimental to our families, wildlife and livestock alike. […] I’m beyond disappointed that the Biden administration is ignoring our concerns by moving forward with the introduction while putting on the façade of seeking more public input after their decision has clearly been made.
The odd thing about all of this? Grizzly bears are not in danger of extinction; they are technically considered ‘threatened’ (by environmentalist entities with a clear agenda, and the power to carry it out), but the grizzly numbers do not entirely bear out even that designation. While estimates suggest there are ‘only’ 1,500 in the lower 48 U.S. states, there are over 31,000 in Alaska and nearly 17,000 in western Canada.
In other words… they are pretty much already thriving in other regions. So why the need to move them to this area?
We can immediately discredit the ‘environmental’ concerns. It does not help the bears (again, thriving elsewhere), and the northern Cascades have been functioning quite swimmingly without their presence.
Talk of restoring natural balance and honoring historical habitats is equally nonsensical. The ecosystem has evolved and adjusted to the grizzlies no longer being around en mass, and a forced reintroduction - no matter how slowly it is implemented - may actually harm said-balance, especially with how the native wildlife has grown accustomed to the grizzlies absence.
Thank you for your continued support, and - if not already a subscriber - join me as we build a unique Substack subculture of information, entertainment, and enlightenment
Furthermore, any self-reverent proclamations about ‘climate change’ (yes, they actually ARE using that particular ‘science’ argument in this case) carries less weight than the breath used to spout it. Cast it aside as propaganda, for it holds no more depth than that.
We can also rule out the notion that this will benefit the people living around the park. The threat to humans (especially children), livestock, and the overall way-of-life is very much on the minds of the residents, and they are speaking out; in truth, they know that this could lead to completely destroying their aforementioned way-of-life.
Which answers the “‘why the need to’ do this,” question; it is exactly what the Globalist powers crave.
In a recent article, where I discussed the critical nature of AM Radio (and how it serves rural concerns), I made the point below (emphasis added)…
That could, in turn, serve to further drain those communities of identity and resources and people, helping to 'encourage' residents to move to larger - dare I say '15 minute' - cities. Ever remember, every action must be viewed through the scope of the Globalist Agenda, and ‘rural living’ has been under assault by those serving that Agenda for decades.
Delude yourselves not, my friends: this bear relocation has absolutely nothing to do with restoring natural habitats or any of the other rubbish they peddle as ‘science.’ It is another example of targeting those who live outside the WEF-approved idea of life; it is an attack on rugged individualism, on living off of (and thus in true balance with) the land, and on existing independent of their faux-society of need.
Simply put, this is an naked assault on a culture Globalists find repellent, and even worse; they view it as a direct threat to their Agenda, and therefore must be destroyed.
You will continue to see examples of this, as they move step-by-laborious-step toward eradicating any semblance of living outside of their agendas and mandates. If we do not speak up and defend this rustic-yet-powerful way-of-life now? When they get around to your neck of the woods - and they will, eventually - or when you decide you might to want to relocate yourself, to live that more ‘natural’ life?
The will be no options available… and no one left to stand with you.
Want to up your game? Grab an annual subscription to The Stone Age! It is now only $37 a year, and with that you get 37% off the monthly rate, full-archive access, and a weekly, Members-Only direct email! Still uncertain? Subscribe for free, and check things out first!
Want to explore living a more 'natural' life, even if you are trapped in a big city?
Notes…
-- Edit 03/15/2024: Updated cover photo.
-- Unless otherwise credited, all images were created by the author, using Substack’s AI Image Generator.
Have we given reasonable consideration to introducing wolves and mountain lions on Martha's Vineyard?
Lotta good eating on a grizzly bear, though. Just sayin'