Blood of the Children
Blood of the Children
Lawsuit challenges state's covert retention of infant blood samples
In virtually every sphere of modern existence, we are witnessing an inferno of disturbing cases, ones where those in Authority are targeting children. The myriad of justifications and excuses offered are sickening to behold, yet curiously accepted - without question - by mainstream ‘journalists.’
Well, let us throw another log on that fire…
Today, a group of New Jersey parents teamed up with the Institute for Justice to file a federal lawsuit challenging New Jersey’s practice of keeping blood samples taken from newborn babies for 23 years, all without parents’ knowledge or consent. Not only does New Jersey hold onto the blood, it can use the blood samples in any manner it chooses.
How can this, in any way, be considered ethical? Moral? Right?
I do understand the need for basic testing for various diseases, yes, and I know that multiple states collect blood samples for such tests; in most of those cases, the samples are destroyed after tests are run, although - and this was alarming to discover - that has not always been the case…
Similar lawsuits already have been brought against Texas, Minnesota and Michigan, and in those cases settlements have ordered the destruction of blood samples held by the states, or the state has voluntarily destroyed them.
Those cases being noted, New Jersey has gone far beyond others with the practices in which they are engaging. As mentioned above, not only were they (according to the suit) storing these samples surreptitiously, without informing the parents or receiving consent, but were planning to hold onto them for 23 years.
Now why on Earth would a state health department feel a need to do that?
Maybe because they are also granting themselves free reign to do whatever they wished with the DNA held within. Would that ‘whatever’ include shady research by dubious government agencies, or selling said-samples to bio-tech companies, or offering it to law-enforcement warrant-free?
Because if so? Problem.
Potential Violations
It is impossible to enumerate all the nefarious scenarios in which Authority could engage with a large databank of DNA, but creative speculation - grounded in legitimate science - can give us a few examples of the most egregious possibilities.
-- Hyper-accelerated eugenics: If a concern was trying to build the perfect human specimen - a ‘master race,’ if you will - and they had access to tens of thousands (or millions?) of DNA samples collected over two decades from which to work? Yep.
-- Cybernetic / AI corporations: If a firm were to acquire access to such a treasure trove of data, can you imagine the leaps and bounds they could take in the development of hybrid human-machines, reminiscent of Star Trek’s Borg? I certainly can.
-- Destruction of civil liberties: Comparing DNA markers with 23 years of documented behaviors in an attempt to (à la the film ‘Minority Report’) pre-determine those who could become criminals, robbing us of the basic right to personal evolution and the grace of choice? Nope, not on board with that, either.
-- Cloning merchants: Talk about a threat to an individual’s unique existence, one which manifests before they can even walk! Do I even need to ruminate further?
‘Rights’ Still Matter
These only scratch the surface; we have not even discussed the potential violation of constitutional guarantees enshrined in our Bill of Rights. For example, the most obvious is related to privacy; call my crazy, but I would think that secretly acquiring the genetic foundation of an individual's entire existence would certainly qualify as privacy being stolen from them.
You also have the ‘illegal search and seizure’ factor to consider. Despite efforts from deviant collectives desperate to ‘adultize’ our young, children cannot legally give ‘consent’ - especially as infants - to do anything, which would include volunteering their DNA. As such, any cases based on bio-material ‘collected at birth,’ would surely fall into the ‘fourth amendment’ category of protections.
There are additional concerns within the ‘religion’ clause of the first amendment as well. From the perspective of many, on a very spiritual level, blood is sacred; the source of life and vitality, it is an esoteric concept captured within a tangible force. To treat it as mere commodity is be collected, bought, and sold (again, involuntarily) spits poison upon those sacred concepts.
There are many more possibilities, none of which bodes well for individual Liberty. With this specific instance you have a state office secretly collecting biological data on private citizens without consent, and apparently not caring that there might something foul about so doing.
To my simpleton brain, this speaks to a degree of corruption that is nearly impossible to grasp. These people are not stupid, after all, which means it is being done with deliberation.
If we step back and consider all the information with an active mind, three basic questions rise to the surface…
1) How many other states are covertly engaged in bio-data collection?
2) If others are, with whom - or what - have they shared said-data?
3) Has the federal government gotten involved as well?
That last one is critical, because if we have learned anything from the past century? D.C entities are more than willing to engage in such operations… and will happily do so in a clandestine manner.
Pushback Is Paramount
Ultimately the core of this issue is, once again, children; such bio-databases - and the potential ramifications of them as catalogued above - threaten the young at their most basic levels of existence. Our most precious-yet-vulnerable treasures are being targeted, and the methods available for protecting them are limited.
Limited, yes - but not barren. Indeed, we DO have options, and we must exercise them.
While lawsuits - like the one discussed here - are certainly viable, not everyone has fair access to the legal system. There are many other actions available to us, however, several of which are already being deployed.
They range from switching away from public health concerns and toward more natural alternatives, to doggedly researching any information provided by those ‘connected,’ to pulling our children and ourselves out of anything which is tied to Globalist entities. Indeed, these - and many more - are occurring right now.
If we are to be taken seriously by those whom control such things, we must be willing to not only act, not only to organize and let our voices be heard, but to continue to support those who are doing the same.
One way of doing these is to get involved in your local elections, so that you are certain that those representing you actually do ‘represent’ you. Make sure to pay close attention to your County Sheriff candidates, as whomever serves in this office could (should!) be one who stands with you when federal overreach occurs.
Online advocacy is important too, for while it is oft marginalized by those who wish to elevate their own importance? It is still a vital component, in both the temporal and ethereal domains. As such, remain active on the apps where you feel you are most effective, never allowing another to extinguish your voice or value.
No matter how we choose, we must be willing to stand firm, in practice and spirit, because the futures of our children - and the future of our very civilization - depends on it.
Perhaps now, in this moment, more so than ever before.
Credit: Special thanks to Raesa, whose proofing skills are very much appreciated.
BONUS TRACK: From “Notes”
Kick social-media censorship to the curb! Like & subscribe, that we are never dependent upon Big-Tech & its oppressive algorithms.
Thank you for an excellent post! I had never heard of government agencies saving blood samples from infants all the way through adulthood. Why? You have to suspect nefarious intentions when they give no logical reason for storing these samples for 23 years! 😳
Excellent article, albeit infuriating!