17 Comments

I voted for him but trust none of them. We all must stay vigilant in protecting our freedoms and making our voices heard.

Expand full comment

I had not heard this before, but considering it was from back in 2023, while in the early stages of the campaign, its grandiosity doesn't surprise me either.

My hope is that if this legacy planning has any traction during his term, and there aren't ten thousand other distractions (both internal and external) that the ideas flow without federal money or mandates.

He does tend to have a very urban centric vision of things, and nearly everyone in his sphere is from some large city, let's also hope that the focus stays with innovation and opportunity, not engineered theoretical efficiencies.

Expand full comment

Crap! I meant to drop a note in there about the date, and completely forgot! 🤦🏻 I'll do that now.

Thanks for mentioning that 🫡

Expand full comment

Much remains to be seen. I voted for Trump because I do believe he is 100% for the USA and the world was a better place during his first term.

He has always been grandiose and since this was from ‘23 let’s hope it was something that was fleeting. True as well that Trump often parrots what he hears from others just to gage the reaction. In fact, it sounds like something Musk would indeed advocate - I don’t trust him for the most part.

Much remains as is obvious. We must make it to and past Inauguration Day and if the drones (100% US military) are any indication of foreshadowing well, we could be in for a SHTF development.

Expand full comment

Hey, whaddayabet that you won’t have to actually purchase a house in Trumpville, but that you can kinda lease it or something like that and avoid having the headaches of owning it outright. That’s Klaus’s definition of happy, remember? And maybe to avoid the perils of banking you could just use a digital form of payment issued by your employer/caretaker! Elon bucks issued with extra credit if you don’t have any bad thoughts this month. How much more freedom can you ask for?

Expand full comment

Following the fall of Babylon the Great, the Beast takes over. A wolf in sheep’s clothing. It’s all playing out.

Expand full comment

Isn't one Brazilia in the America's already one too many?

Urban planning has always been a means of war on the many.

SMH.

Expand full comment

I hear you friend loud and clear! The elites have many masks but one agenda!!

Expand full comment

Herr Stone

Great points

Keep their feet to the fire

Look at the laughing stock our PM in Canada is now as his own party disintegrates from profligate spending deficits

Unfunded as most of us struggle to pay grocery bills and mortgages

The Worst Prime Minister Ever!

Hopefully 46 will not go WEF

We shall see- l am optimistic but also cognizant

Tusen Takk

Jon

Expand full comment

We have been warned so many times..

Thanks!!

Expand full comment

Why build them when you could make every city, town and county free? How? Challenge and reverse Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926), more commonly known as Euclid v. Ambler. This is the 1926 Supreme Court decision that enabled zoning, i. e., the power of governments to regulate what can be done with private property, which derives from the police powers of the state.

Expand full comment

He was specifically put in office to forward the agenda!! They knew damn good and well they had no possibility of getting it done without civil war from the "other" side- so they lulled everyone back into submission by giving the masses what they wanted- The Fuckin Trojan Horse is Already Here!!

Expand full comment

I'm a passionate advocate for Free Cities, but I'm very skeptical about whether Trump's Freedom Cities would be Free Cities at all. Selling federal land to pay down the national debt and allowing private developers to build whatever the market wants is a great idea. However, I find it hard to believe that the US government would keep its hands off whatever contracts the developers and their customers want to make between themselves.

I'm opposed to zoning laws in general and especially those that prevent mixed use of land, meaning that people should be allowed to have cities or communities where they can live, work, shop, and play within a 15-minute walk, if they choose. The only problem with what people are calling "15-minute cities" is that it always assumes people would be prohibited from leaving their communities. If the freedom to travel is violated, that has nothing to do with mixed land use being available to those who want it.

Expand full comment

Freedom + cities = massive control and eventual death. No thanks, this is the EXACT same crappola the globalists are pushing. See, your savoir Trump is looking like one of them more and more each day.

Along with massive surveillance using digital IDs and a bitcoin czar (czars are inherently communist visions of tyranny) and massive tariffs (which are taxes on consumers in the end) it's looking more like a country that's going to be subjugated to a Hellish existence.

The same existence we thought we were going to avoid by rejecting the Marxist democrats. Stay vigilant.

Expand full comment

4 years and some other plan some other president. By the way stoner, for every freedom city there should be a freedom nuclear power plant and a freedom protected electrical grid that can supply and function on its own. Your gonna have to have a freedom data center and of course a freedom bank with maybe a freedom currency based on a freedom precious metal. I’ll stop. Sorry

Expand full comment

Well said as usual, sir. Voting for him to gain the relief of the past four years is exactly what I did. As with any candidate, promises are thrown about like lollipops. No matter what the rebrand is here, living away from the every spying eye of the fed is what will get us back to “normal”.

Expand full comment

Hmmmm

Expand full comment